> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Raul D > Jose Mario Quintana wrote: > > Right, and the unfortunate consequence, for those of us that like > > doing things tacitly, is that fixing tacit verbs involving $: > > results in verbose hybrid verbs. > > Well... you could propose a solution.
Oh, but I have been dreaming about it for a long time; see http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2005-February/020757.html and find $:: (by the way, I will the last person to say that the new J6 fixing capabilities regarding $: are not an improvement). > > For example, let's imagine an adjective $:. where f $:. is > equivalent to f > > Furthermore, in the definition of f, the verb f $:. should be > treated as if it were "named", for the purpose of resolving $: > > Thus, > >:@($:@<:^:]$:.) 1 > 1 > > in contrast with > >:@($:@<:^:]) 1 > 2 > > Feel free to propose something better (simpler, easier to > understand, whatever), of course. > > -- > Raul > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
