Lorin Lund wrote: > force sequential traversal of an array? The only alternative I > currently see is using 'for loops' to force the order.
If 'for loops' means looping using keyword "for_x.", Henry Rich had once pointed out that its order of execution is undefined. The apparent sequential execution order might change in future releases. Nothing is ever guaranteed. You know that. -- regards, bill ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
