If }:: (unfetch) were implemented the arguments
would be even simpler:
'*' ((1,.2 3),0 7) unfetch 2 9$'-'
-------*-
--**-----
unfetch=: 1 : '[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ [`(m {:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@])`(,@]) }'
NB. for (0=L.)
----- Original Message ----
From: "Brewer, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:19:03 PM
Subject: [Jprogramming] RE: }
This seems interesting:
'*' (({1;2 3),{0;7) } 2 9$'-'
-------*-
--**-----
-Andrew
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:23:54 +0100
> From: "Fred Bone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] }
> On 18 Jul 2006 at 23:06, Andrew Nikitin said:
>
> FWIW,
> '*' ((<1;2 3),<0;7 7) } 2 9$'-'
> -------*-
> --**-----
>
> If you could produce an adverb that would map
> ((<1;2 3),<0;7)
> into
> ((<1;2 3),<0;7 7)
> and do something equivalent and suitable in the general case, you'd have
> a fix for the problem.
>
> I'm not confident I can even describe the general case, never mind deal
> with it ...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
