It not just an empty array but an empty produced
by the catenation of two empties.  This does not
seem like a firm foundation to build code on.



----- Original Message -----
From: Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:59 am
Subject: RE: [Jprogramming] data type of empty ,  empty

> > Why does it matter to you?
> 
> Because an empty list of boxes is different from an
> empty list of numbers, and code can work or not work
> depending on which result is produced by , .
> 
> Also, the behavior as described below violates the
> principle of J that the user doesn't need to concern
> himself with the type of numbers.  As implemented, a
> complex list produces numbers, while an integer
> list produces boxes.
> 
> It is very important that empties be handled consistently,
> and not just by pretending that the type doesn't matter,
> so that code doen't have to check for empty operands.
> 
> Henry Rich
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Hui
> > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:15 AM
> > To: Programming forum
> > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] data type of empty , empty
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:56 pm
> > Subject: [Jprogramming] data type of empty ,  empty
> > 
> > > I tested appending empty to empty of different data types.
> > >   (3!:0) (0$0) , 0$0
> > > 1
> > >   (3!:0) (0$0) , 0$' '
> > > 2
> > >   (3!:0) (0$2) , 0$' '
> > > 4
> > >   (3!:0) (0$2.2) , 0$' '
> > > 8
> > >   (3!:0) (0$u:'a') ,~ 0$a:
> > > 131072
> > >   (3!:0) (0$u:'a') , 0$a:
> > > 131072
> > >   (3!:0) (0$' ') ,~ 0$a:
> > > 32
> > >   (3!:0) (0$1r3) , 0$a:
> > > 128
> > >   (3!:0) (0$0) , 0$a:
> > > 32
> > >   (3!:0) (0$2) , 0$a:
> > > 32
> > >   (3!:0) (0$2.2) , 0$a:
> > > 8
> > >   (3!:0) (0$1j2) , 0$a:
> > > 16
> > > 
> > > At first, I thought data type is the larger of 3!:0, but a 
> counter 
> > > example in
> > > the last line. It also seems data type does not depend on 
> leftmost 
> > > or rightmost
> > > position. Does anyone know the rule of deriving the data type?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to