Thanks!

I shall add the special section of the dictionary as a place to look
into when searching for such interesting idioms.


On 10/26/06, Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is not a rediscovery because it never was lost.
Also, it is recorded in the release notes and
in Appendix B of the dictionary.

http://www.jsoftware.com/help/release/iamend.htm
http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/special.htm



----- Original Message -----
From: Yuvaraj Athur Raghuvir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:14 pm
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Choose Operators

> If this 'rediscovery' has to be recorded, which would be the best
> place - Dictionary, Phrases or somewhere else?
>
>
> On 10/25/06, Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The "recently" in the quoted text dates from the
> > year 2000 in the J4.05 release notes:
> >
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/help/release/iamend.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:38 am
> > Subject: RE: [Jprogramming] Choose Operators
> >
> > > The forms of this idiom that assign the result to a name
> > > benefit from some special code:
> > >
> > >  The phrase b}x,:y for numeric x and y is equivalent to the
> > >  well-known phrase (x*b)+y*-.b . Recently, special code has
> > >  been implemented for the phrase name=: c}x,y,...,:z , with
> > >  boolean c as a special case, and the amendment is done in
> > >  place if name is x or y and c is boolean. (In-place
> > >  amendment is eschewed for integral c due to the possibility
> > >  of index error.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to