Roger Hui wrote: > It is arguable and rejected. > > Any CPB number less than 1 is exceptional and > requires explanation.
The implication here seems to be that that case was rejected for lack of explanation (as opposed to some other reason). However, rather than risk that your intent differed from what you expressed, let's try a different case: require 'jmf' f=: jpath '~system/examples/games/solitaire/cards.j31' (#r) %~ 2.2e9 * 6!:2 'JCHAR map_jmf_ ''r'';f' 0.924737 Here, I am interpreting as "result" a value made available to the j environment as a result of the execution of the right argument to 6!:2. A quirk, here, is that the argument is small and the result is large. Different arguments could give different results, but that seems in accord with the original problem statement. Another quirk, here, is that the result is placed in the symbol table by lower level logic, rather than as a result of =: in the expression. So, my question is: is this a valid instance of CPB? And, if not, could you explain the surrounding reasons (so that I could apply the rule to other contexts)? Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
