Henry Rich wrote:
> I note that
>
> ((i.#q) { q) -: q
>1
>
> is almost a tautology, so I dont know why you have
> ((i.#q) { q) instead of q.
I don't know that I can account for that, Rich. Public exhibition of my
coding failures is embarrassing, frankly. It seems that I was
attempting to make explicit what J means by nouns. Or, less varnished,
it was my attempt to impose a looping structure, not having recognized
that none was necessary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
