The frames are perfectly the same size. It's just that the bordering frames were chopped off, which could happen at a photo store. So you might be better off scanning the original film.
Anyway, of you apply correct padding to compensate for the chop-off, the splitting is simply even cut operation. However, if you superimpose the frames you see camera movement against still background. So probably a better solution is a mouse-driven tool to align the frames. But the original split can still be done evenly with padding. LOMO stands for Leningrad Optical-Mechanical Organization. Smena 8M was my first camera when I was 8 or 9. You had to mix the chemicals and develop your own prints in black and white. I also owned Agat 18 which took split frames: 72 off of 36 frame film. --- Brian Schott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because of a comment Cliff Reiter made, it now > occurs to me that the "trimmed down" .jpg file I mentioned > might not be as good as the original .jpg file of this > picture for the purpose of finding the frame lines. So if > anyone wants the full sized file, it is at the following > link. > > http://schott.selfip.net/~brian/winspr0607/Pages/Image31.html > > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Brian Schott wrote: > > + I have pictures from a new camera like the trimmed > + down copy temporarily at > + http://schott.selfip.net/~brian/pix/oktotyler.jpg , and I am > + trying to learn how to convert such snapshots into a > + minimovie like the ones at http://www.lomohomes.com/oktopus > + (click on "minimovies at the bottom right corner of the > + webpage). > + > > (B=) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
