On 5/16/07, Tom R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am currently on the nearly vertical J learning curve and am primarily interested in number theory applications. To that end I have been working my way through Iverson's "Concrete Math Companion" and have encountered a conjunction which no longer works in J601. That conjunction is [.
Yeah, that doesn't work any more. For simple cases, it's equivalent to (2 :'u') but J also no longer supports the tacit use of conjunctions. (If you supply one of the arguments, that turns it into an adjective, and J still supports that. But most likely you'll be running into other cases that aren't like this.) I would guess that the right approach is -- if you can't figure out how to do something from concrete math, quote it here and we'll try to give you some alternative expressions to satisfy some aspect of that case. FYI, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
