Exactly. Test-first works wonders here. A verb that passes by without
being tested can fester and be nasty to sort out.
Raul Miller wrote:
On 6/2/07, R.A. MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Raul;
sorry....
x =: 3 : 0
b c d
)
x f. N.B. no value error....
I don't care about that, as that has nothing to do with any
recent changes. The only generic way to test explicit
definitions is to run them.
--
later ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|\/| Randy A MacDonald | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram)
|/\| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|\ | | The only real problem with APL is that
BSc(Math) UNBF'83 | it is "still ahead of its time."
Sapere Aude | - Morten Kromberg
| Looking for a whip-smart APL developer? Send me a
note.
Natual born APL'er | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----{ gnat }-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
