On 8/7/07, Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There have not been any changes in the interpreter > in this regard. Perhaps the defn of "load" was changed > and that could have changed the behaviour. Or perhaps > you did your experiments using "load", thinking that > it was equivalent to 0!:0@< .
On reflection, I have realized that this latter is the case: I was thinking that the local context I saw when using 'load' was a property of 0!:0 rather than being a consequence of load having an explicit (rather than tacit) definition. Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
