On 8/16/07, Brian Schott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   1 2 3 <.  1 _. 3
> 1 _. 3
>   1 2 3 <.~ 1 _. 3
> 1 2 3

I expect that this is a reflection of how <. is implemented.

In other words, I think that this is no coincidence:

   1 2 3 ([^:<"0) 1 _. 3
1 2 3
   1 2 3 ([^:<"0)~ 1 _. 3
1 _. 3


-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to