#.31#1
2147483647
seems to work, but the real challenge seems to be deciphering the
measures introduced by the posers. Worrying over 7-vs-6 characters isn't
going to meet customer needs, BTJMO,ICBW.
John Randall wrote:
Roger Hui wrote:
<:2^31x is acceptable but it would not be as good
as the other solutions according to the rather
contrived requirements. ("... number of characters
composing nouns ...").
Thanks, Roger.
John
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|\/| Randy A MacDonald | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram)
|/\| ramacd <at> nbnet.nb.ca |
|\ | | The only real problem with APL is that
BSc(Math) UNBF'83 | it is "still ahead of its time."
Sapere Aude | - Morten Kromberg
Natural Born APL'er |
-----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----{ gnat }-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
