Moreover, wouldn't the ambivalent solitary * serve the purpose? --- Eric Iverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The general cd approach is to be restrictive and dogmatic about declaration > and parameter agreement. The consequences of allowing an incorrect call are > serious (crashes or memory corruption). My immediate reaction is against > suggestions for figuring out what the declaration should have been. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "bill lam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 9:36 PM > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] passing unicode argument to dll > > > > Hi Eric, > > Not related to Kairit's original problem, but would you consider that *w > > is redundant because the J interpretation knows whether the data is > > utf8/utf16 and can choose between effect of *c/*w accordingly during > > actual calling dll. > > > > Eric Iverson wrote: > >> If the data is utf8 then you want *c declarations. If the data is utf16 > >> then you want *w declarations. > > > > -- > > regards, > > bill > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
