> Hey Roger, what is the rationale for restricting the domain of > should-be-niladic functions?
a. I disagree that the functions in questions should be niladic. Niladic functions are a bad idea (e.g. how do you interpret f=: niladic ; is niladic in the domain of adverbs and conjunctions; etc.) b. For verbs whose arguments have no significance but must be supplied, that argument is required to be an empty vector because it is better to be strict now than to be sorry about being lax later. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
