On 11/7/07, Tracy Harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tried to think of a way to make a tacitly-defined adverb strictly > dyadic, but cannot identify any way to do so.
I believe you mean that you want the result of a tacitly-defined adverb to be strictly dynamic (to have no monadic domain). If so, I would use ([: :) For example: chr=: &(a.&i.)([: :) That said, for something like chr I think an ambivalent result is superior. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
