DB=me,RM=Raul
DB> The previous verbs are recursive; if you want an iterative formulation,
you
DB> need to drop the $: .
RM> Or wrap its use with 3 :'' or 4 :''
Yes, I indirectly touched on this in an earlier message:
DB> Here's one way:
DB> zUr2=: (2$:1 0,~1+]) : ([EMAIL
PROTECTED](>:@[$:],1,0$~1={)@.(<:{.))
DB> zUr4=: }.@:zUr2 f.
DB> zUr4
DB> }.@:(3 : '(2 $: 1 0 ,~ 1 + ]) :([EMAIL PROTECTED](>:@[ $: ] , 1 , 0
$~ 1 =
{)@.(<: {.)) y' :(4 : 'x (2 $: 1 0 ,~ 1 + ]) :([EMAIL PROTECTED](>:@[ $: ] , 1
, 0 $~ 1
= {)@.(<: {.)) y'))
BTW Raul, I didn't miss your last post in the "gerunds from explicit verb
results?" thread. But while composing a response, I was led me onto an
interesting tangent. I may have something interesting this weekend.
-Dan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-behead-included--tf4778131s24193.html#a13673508
Sent from the J Programming mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
