---Joey wrote:
> Oops, I am sorry for sending this message so soon after, but
> I just found it out.
> -(i.4)*]
> Is the verb for me! Unless there are betters ways to do it,
> but that looks good to me.
Yes or
verb=: -(i.4)&*
> Are there better or standard ways of getting 100-200 for example.
> I would do:
> 99+i.101
> Or something like that, althought that only gives 100 - 199?
100+i.101
You might be also be interested in the steps verb from numeric.ijs:
NB.*steps v steps from a to b in c steps
NB. form: steps a,b,c
steps=: {. + (1&{ - {.) * (i.@>: % ])@{:
steps 10 20 10
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
