Igor Zhuravlov wrote: > > [...] > - Current addon realization provides both double and complex interfaces, > e.g. > "dgeev.ijs" and "zgeev.ijs". Would it be better to implement single gate > instead, say, "geev.ijs", with embedded dispatching directly to LAPACK's > DGEEV/ZGEEV? > I'd say that in such a case name "dzgeev.ijs" would be more appropriate since it's about a single call of dgeev or zgeev.
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LAPACK-interfaces-architecture-tp14535312s24193p14569190.html Sent from the J Programming mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
