Raul wrote:
> >: @ _
> |domain error
>
> _ is not in the domain of @ (and, @ is executed
> at "definition time").
That helped a lot. I inaccurately imagined the & of
>: @ _&".
to be evaluated first, before the @. Now I have a
better sense of how operators parse.
The bogus version where I tried to produce a parallel
form with parentheses was, at least, built in hasty
reaction to my inability to make ": @ >: @ _&". work.
It didn't feel J-like as I did it, but a corrected
version does.
": @ >: @ (_&".)
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
