I agree with you on explicit loops. Necessary for performance reasons only. Anyone new to J should avoid it the first couple of years.
Instead of <@;\. I rather would have had ,&.>/\. but that doesn't work. R.E. Boss > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:programming- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dan Bron > Verzonden: vrijdag 18 januari 2008 16:41 > Aan: [email protected] > Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] New improvement on comb > > > RE Boss wrote: > > Perhaps a candidate for a Jem > > comb3=: [:; [:(,.&.><@;\.)/ >:@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Absolutely. When I first started learning J I was a bit disappointed at > discovering "comb" on the for. page; I expected that such an tool would be > a > simple tacit expression in J. I considered (and still do) explicit loops > to > be weapons of the last resort. > > Plus that \. is neat. I'd write more but today, unlike yesterday, I > have > work to do. > > -Dan > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/New-improvement-on- > comb-tp14951126s24193p14951476.html > Sent from the J Programming mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
