Thank you for testing it under Wine. I noticed the image location issues (same in Test section in main file). I will try to accommodate version differences in the next version.
7!:0'' may or may not report non-J memory allocations. --- bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > VariantClear doesn't crash J under wine. > > However by printing 7!:0'' before and after running test.ijs (after amending > it > to use getimg1), the numbers are the same with or without VariantClear so > that I > still think that VariantClear or the previous olerelease is redundant. > > BTW test.ijs contains /path/to/images that need fixing in J602. > > Oleg Kobchenko wrote: > > No, it's OK to use VariantClear to any properly > > created variant. VariantInit just properly zeros > > memory and sets type to VT_EMPTY. > > > > VariantClear should exacly call the one and only > > correct Release. > > > > Yes, obj->vtbl->Release is the definition > > of ((*IUnknown)pobj)->Release. > > > > Does it not work on Wine? > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
