But if you define P=. @:] once, you would not save any characters afterwards by using cap. Am I missing something? Was this the compelling reason to introduce the anomaly?
From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:16:08 AM On 2/21/08, Jose Mario Quintana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had been trying, since the cap's inception, to figure out what the > advantages were (apart from saving one or two characters). I thought that conciseness was the issue (and that saving two characters for a frequent case was an example of this conciseness). -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
