Right again. Your last case, of course, also can be simplified (and rewritten) as, s_x_=: 1: do_x_ 'r=: s' r_x_ f. |value error: s | r_x_ f. s=: ? (r_x_ -: r_x_ f.)0 0 r_x_ 0 1 r_x_ f. ?
----- Original Message ---- From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, this is essentially the "ridiculous" last answer (I should have > written the "ridiculously > simple" answer) mentioned in the spoiler: I believe you are refering to the first part of my response. I further developed that example to illustrate a different case. (That case should probably be classified as a bug.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
