That's it. I guess the performance issue was my private observation which I took for granted reasoning that primitive over array with copy should beat infix adverb.
Kudos to infix with the latest fix. --- Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wrote: > > Oleg, I haven't been watching the Forums closely lately; would you point > > me to the messages > that > > highlighted this behavior (i.e. shift+operate is faster than infix)? > > Oleg responded: > > Follow thread: > > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2008-March/009925.html > > I followed it, but couldn't find the relevant message. I see lots of > infix-like methods > compared, but more for elegance than performance. Could you point me at the > specific message? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
