On 3/17/08, Mark D. Niemiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wasn't suggesting that _. be removed from the language; > it seems that in 6.02 this is already being done in part. > I was merely suggesting that the spelling '_.' be removed > from the number parser. so there was no 'easy' way for a > J prgram to create NaNs. This is currently already the > case for -NaN, and all the other flavors of NaN.
Wouldn't this make testing difficult? -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
