Right, I mean linear in n.

In a scalar language, the advantage of heaping to find
the k smallest values is that, in effect, you don't have
to sort the whole way.  You just have to go as far as
making a heap, which takes on the order of a couple of
compares and a swap per item of input.  And it works for
any datatype.

Once you have made the heap, you then extract the biggest
items, which takes k lg n time, but that is small if
k << n .

It would be interesting if someone motivated were to code
the heap-creation process in J and see how it compares
to /:~ .

Henry Rich

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Hui
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:17 PM
> To: Programming forum
> Subject: [Jprogramming] Re: Jprogramming] Biggest values from list
> 
> Surely you don't mean linear in k but linear in n?
> You have to examine at least every item to find
> the maximum.  If it's linear in n then so is
> /: and /:~ (albeit with a larger factor) for vectors 
> of many datatypes.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, March 20, 2008 12:42
> Subject: RE: [Jprogramming] Biggest values from list
> To: 'Programming forum' <[email protected]>
> 
> > Agreed, use /:  .  In a scalar language the way to do 
> > this is
> > to build a heap and then pull the top k items, which takes
> > linear time if k is much less than n.  I suspect this is not
> > very efficient in J.
> > 
> > Henry Rich 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Hui
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:15 AM
> > > To: Programming forum
> > > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Biggest values from list
> > > 
> > > If you just want the largest value (and its position) then
> > > it can be done conveniently without sorting or grading.
> > > If you want the largest k values where k>1 then
> > > the most convenient way is to grade, along the lines
> > > that Raul Miller has shown.
> > > 
> > > Why do you want to avoid sorting/grading?  In J, for vectors
> > > of many datatypes, including the integer and floating point
> > > datatypes, sorting and grading takes linear time.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Nick Kostirya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Thursday, March 20, 2008 2:25
> > > Subject: [Jprogramming] Biggest values from list
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > 
> > > > Hello, All
> > > > 
> > > > Can you please provide me with the most optimal way of 
> > picking 
> > > > out a
> > > > given number of elements with the biggest values from a 
> huge list?
> > > > 
> > > > The values and the elements' positions in a list are a 
> > matter of
> > > > interest.
> > > > 
> > > > Can we manage this without sorting?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to