Zsbán Ambrus wrote: > For the latter, could you not use almost the same thing as for one > variables, but replace * in its definition with multiplication of > single variable polynomials, and + with addition of single variable > polynomials? The result would probably be assembled in the right way > by the normal fill rules. I'm not completely sure that would work, > but it's worth a try.
You're right: thanks! ppr2=: +//.@(ppr"1/) seems to do the job. Best wishes, John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
