Henry wrote:
> (#~ (= +))@(1&{::)@p.@(-/)@,:
Raul elaborated:
> ~.@(#~ (= +)) ...
Thanks guys, I didn't even think of these cases. This helps.
But I don't understand why you're both suggesting -/@:,: instead of just -
dyadically. What's the value add? Is it to generalize to the case of more
than two polynomials? Would -/ even be meaningful in that case? [1]
-Dan
[1] For more than two polynomials -/:@,: wouldn't work, but maybe you're
thinking along the lines of $:@:,: : (-/) ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
