My apologies, I thought it was 1 2 3 ,. 4 5 6 . Those dots are tricky....
Sherlock, Ric wrote:
Randy can you elaborate?
Using some rough transliteration where
<- is assign
_ is high minus
[] is quad.
In APL+Win with []io <-0
x <- 3 4 5
y <- 2 3 9
x,[_0.5] y
3 4 5
2 3 9
Which certainly seems to be equivalent to the behaviour of x,:y in J??
---Randy MacDonald wrote:
No, it isn't.
Roger Hui wrote:
x,[_0.5] y in APL is equivalent to x,:y in J.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|\/| Randy A MacDonald | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram)
|/\| ramacd <at> nbnet.nb.ca |
|\ | | The only real problem with APL is that
BSc(Math) UNBF'83 | it is "still ahead of its time."
Sapere Aude | - Morten Kromberg
Natural Born APL'er |
-----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----{ gnat }-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
