It is neat as a hack should be. If it were in English, it could have been branded as a case of double negative.
----- Original Message ---- > From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Programming forum <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 1:57:21 AM > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Re: mingle multiple arguments into u`v/ gerund > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Oleg Kobchenko wrote: > > [spoiler] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (p. i.@>: % ])~`(],-)/@|. 3 5 10 > > 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]&' ' gives me 21 for that definition, vs. 22 for > >> steps =: {. - -/@}: * (i.@>: % ])@{: > > However, I get 20 with this definition: > steps=: -/[EMAIL PROTECTED]: p. (i.@>: % -)@{: > > -- > Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
