Because its a test algorithm. (y*2)+y was just a simple example (I don't actually need (y*2)+y) for anything, I just made it up when writing to the list.
It could be (y*2)+20 or (y*9)-28 I am just trying to understand tacit verbs more, and I set myself little algorithms to experiment in J. I am just trying to understand the individual steps required to make a tacit verb out of such simple calculations. On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Markus Schmidt-Gröttrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not just > > r=: *&3 > > Markus > Ian Gorse schrieb: >> >> Hi list, >> >> Another learning question. >> >> I have a really simple monad verb that I wish to convert into a tacit >> verb. >> >> I actually thought I finally understood conjuctions and bonding but >> that don't seem to be the case. >> >> t =: 3 : '(y*2)+y' >> t 10 >> 30 >> >> What do I need to do I wanted to convert (y*2)+y that into a tacit verb? >> >> The way I was thinking was >> >> r=: (*&2)+(*&1) >> r 10 >> 30 >> >> Even though that has produced the correct answer, what is the best way? >> >> Thanks >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
