I was wondering why {: and }: don't have a dyadic form analogous to {. & }. ?
Is it just the benefits aren't seen to be great enough, or is there something
more?
Note:
In the absence of dyadic {: and }: the following do the job: {.&.|. and }.&.|.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
