This morning finally I read the subject line of your post and its the most concise possible description of the problem at hand. I apologize for my inadequate remarks.
BTW, a few years ago we had a similar problem: http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2005-January/019976.html R.E. Boss -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens R.E. Boss Verzonden: zondag 19 oktober 2008 22:54 Aan: 'Programming forum' Onderwerp: RE: [Jprogramming] Re: next not greater I did receive your first and adequate statement, but had to translate it in something like "find the minimal indices larger than the given ones, with values (in A) less or equal" before I could solve it. R.E. Boss -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Raul Miller Verzonden: zondag 19 oktober 2008 22:11 Aan: Programming forum Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] Re: next not greater On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 3:55 PM, R.E. Boss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ts'(I.B)([>:@+{(1 i.~>:)>:@[}.])"0 _ A' > 0.09702199 216000 Nice, thank you. > It would have saved me time if you had (also) stated the problem in English. Did you not receive http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2008-October/012562.html ? Or was that statement of the problem inadequate? I ask because this is not the first time I have received a response where it seems as if people had not received one of my posts. Thank you, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
