Raul Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:44 AM, John Randall > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's unexpected in that I get something different. > > I am using a different definition, based on your description rather than > your > literal code: > op=: (10x^31) | ] + 0x,~}. > invop=: (10x^31) | -/\.
OK: got you. I am not sure how the DE responded to overflow. Best wishes, John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
