---Raul Miller wrote: > Sherlock, Ric wrote: > > Can anyone confirm or correct the following analysis of the > > sentence: ... > If we start with > tstr=: '(* ,: +)' > then ... > That + (in: + 1 : tstr) is just an argument that will be > ignored by this adverb, > so that it knows that it's time to produce its result.
Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
