On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:23 PM, John Randall <[email protected]> wrote: > This is actually legal but extremely annoying. See
That's bad. > http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/12/05/sax2.html > > tip #2. When I looked at that page, I see tips, 1, 3 and 4, but no tip 2. I had to view source to find tip 2. Basically, though, it looks like the SAX interface assumes that the code driving it will manage some of its state transition context -- SAX by itself is not a complete implementation. In the context of J, however, I think that the code which drives SAX should deal with this issue. This would be much better than replicating that logic in almost every non-buggy application which uses it. (Especially since this kind of scalar operation really belongs in J's primitives, and not in application specific code.) -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
