> From: John Randall <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks to all, especially Roger, for the dyadic fork examples.
>
> I regard the tautologies as a bit meta, but I do like >. - <. . I had a
> more complicated example along the same lines.
>
> Before posing the question, I followed Oleg's advice in that I eyeballed
> the dyads in J Phrases: almost all use [ ] @ @: or constant functions.
Also
GCD * LCM is (*. * +.) tautology *
I don't know what LCM % GCD is, but it is always whole
and has some pattern
load'viewmat'
viewmat (*. % +.)"0/~ 2+i.100
viewmat | (*. % +.)"0/~ 2+i:50
viewmat |%:(*. % +.)"0/~ 2+i.100
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
