When learning to overcome this type of mistake I found it useful to identify a variety of synonyms:
(%: ^: 2) 16 %: ^: (2) 16 %: ^: 2 ] 16 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > %: ^: 2 (16) > > Henry Rich > > [email protected] wrote: >> 2 (%:^:) 16 >> >> 2 >> >> that works >> >> %: ^: 2 16 >> >> %:^:2 16 >> >> Hum... that doesn't work >> >> ----- Original Message Follows ----- >> From: Viktor Cerovski <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Jprogramming] Power of adverbs >> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:27:19 -0700 (PDT) >> >>> J's dictionary gives this interesting expression: >>> >>> >>>> The phrase x f...@[&0 y is equivalent to f^:x y , apply the >>>> monad f x times to y . >>>> >>> There is another equivalent, adverbial, phrase: >>> >>> x (f^:) y >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Power-of-adverbs-tp23642873s24193p23642873.html >>> Sent from the J Programming mailing list archive at >>> Nabble.com. >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >>> ----------- For information about J forums see >>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
