So many things:

I knew that, but it just passed by my un-seeing eyes.

thanks

----- Original Message Follows -----
From: Don Guinn <[email protected]>
To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] question about Roger Hui -
perfect power code
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:53:57 -0500

>The x: is a verb which converts e to an extended integer.
>Probably makes the exponentation be performed by repeated
>squaring.
>
>On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:39 PM,
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In the following code:
>>
>> pp=: 3 : 0
>>    for_e. 2+i.>.2^.y do.
>>        m=. e <....@%: y
>>        if. y=m^x: e do. m,e return. end.
>>   end.
>>  ''
>>  )
>>
>> I understand that:
>>
>> if. y=m^x: e do. m,e return. end.
>>
>> will exit when the input y equals the m^x: and display m
>>,e 
>> 1.  Where does the "x" come from.  I do not supply it as
>> a left-hand-side argument.
>> 2.  what is the significance of "x:"
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation.
>>
>> A comment:
>>
>> In reading about the "perfect power" there was a
>> statement I found that (I think) ...
>> said that the only exponents I should test were those
>> that were prime.
>>
>> Is it cheaper time-wise to just do all the exponents from
>> 2 to >. 2 ^. y or would
>> it be faster to prune the for_e list so it only contains
>> primes.
>>
>> ----- Original Message Follows -----
>> From: Roger Hui <[email protected]>
>> To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] perfect power???
>> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:11:41 -0700
>>
>> >Somewhere in the bowels of q: it calls 1&p:
>> >before launching into the much more expensive
>> >factoring routine.
>> >
>> >It seems to me there should be a straightforward
>> >determination of whether a number  y is a perfect power:
>> >just try all possible exponents from 2 to 2 >....@^. y .
>> >For example, for 2^607x the exponents are from 2 to 607,
>> >which is not many exponents to try.  Thus:
>> >
>> >pp=: 3 : 0
>> > for_e. 2+i.>.2^.y do.
>> >  m=. e <....@%: y
>> >  if. y=m^x: e do. m,e return. end.
>> > end.
>> > ''
>> >)
>> >
>> >   pp 81
>> >9 2
>> >   pp 128
>> >2 7
>> >   pp 125
>> >5 3
>> >   pp 2^100x
>> >1125899906842624 2
>> >   pp <:2^607x
>> >
>> >   6!:2 'pp <: 2^607x'
>> >0.159832
>> >
>> >pptest=: *...@#@pp
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: Raul Miller <[email protected]>
>> >Date: Monday, June 8, 2009 15:32
>> >Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] perfect power???
>> >To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:13 PM,
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > From what I am read in this article, determing if a
>> >> > number is a "Perfect Power" should be
>> >> > a lot faster.  Either that or I am totally
>> mis-reading
>> >> > the article.
>> >>
>> >> Determining if a number is a perfect power is
>> >> certainly faster than some algorithm for determining
>> >> if a number is prime.
>> >>
>> >> But do you have any reason to believe J uses that
>> >> algorithm, in its implementation of q?
>> >>
>> >> That said, 1 p: will determine whether or not a number
>> >> is prime, and might be faster than 1 = # q: in some
>> >> cases.
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------
>> >- ----------- For information about J forums see
>> >http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------- For information about J forums see
>>http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm 
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>----------- For information about J forums see
>http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to