On Fri, 03 Jul 2009, Sherlock Ric wrote: > I don't have any philosophical problems with the DOJ names. It just > seems to me that in order to resolve the current conflict it is more > practical to change a label/name of convenience in the dictionary > (no statements of function need to be changed) than it is to rename > the verbs in task.ijs thus potentially breaking existing code. > However as far as I'm concerned any solution that clears up the > confusion without causing additional problems is fine!
IMHO if nomenclature in task.ijs is incorrect or causing confusion then it is a baggage. It is desirable to get it fixed even that means breaking existing code. just my $0.02 -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
