2009/7/20 Sherlock, Ric <[email protected]>: > Is there a reason that the 2nd one is not: > (v0`v1`v2)} y ↔ (v0 y) (v1 y)} (v2 y)
I have often wondered this myself, but this can be achieved with v0`v1`v2}~ y Unfortunately, this also typically requires v0, v1, and v2 all end with @] which is rather verbose... -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
