On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Kip Murray<[email protected]> wrote: > I was influenced by the discussion in thread Peculiarity of Link, and opted > for > the uniformity of having every set satisfy 0 < L. . I decided to see where > that > decision would take me.
This seems to be a minor concern about notation? > In private correspondence it has been suggested that elements be required to > satisfy [: -. 0 e. $ -- that is, no empty array may be an element. What do > you > think? This seems to me to be inconsistent and would make the implementation useless in contexts where empty arrays were an important part of the domain. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
