Raul Miller-4 wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Viktor > Cerovski<[email protected]> wrote: >> adv=:/ >> conj=:" >> A =: v adv conj >> A >> v/conj > > adv has "executed" and v/ is its result. >
That is (less than) the half of the answer, because in order to produce v/conj, two "executions" take place: 1) the bident (v adv) is evaluated to produce the verb v/, and then 2) the bident (v/)conj is evaluated to produce the adverb v/conj The (version of Dan's) question now is: why 2) does not produce v/" instead of v/conj, or even 1) does not produce (v adv) instead of (v/)? >> *: A >> v/"0 0 0 > > A has "executed" and v/"0 0 0 is its result. > True. Then, a few lines later, with v defined to be +, we got: *: A 1 2 3 14 instead of: (+/"0 0 0)1 2 3 1 2 3 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stacking-by-name-tp24918138s24193p24965588.html Sent from the J Programming mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
