On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Kip Murray<[email protected]> wrote: > I think it would need to be > > NB. A "set" is 0$<1 or a 'realsetted' list of unique boxes. ... > What do you think?
I am uncomfortable with this approach. It does not document the data structure concepts, like the previous versions did. Nor does it define an API. It's sort of half-way inbetween. Meanwhile, I would not try and be sneaky about this, and "hide the issue from the user". Otherwise, users will run into problems when they start coding systems which use sets of sets of sets nested arbitrary levels deep, or when they use sets of sequences of sets of sequences, or some other such variants. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
