--- Den tors 20/8/09 skrev Zsbán Ambrus <[email protected]>:
> Fra: Zsbán Ambrus <[email protected]> > Emne: Re: [Jprogramming] tacit definition > Til: "Programming forum" <[email protected]> > Dato: torsdag 20. august 2009 15.47 > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Raul > Miller<[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Zsbán Ambrus<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> ([^2:)+(2**)+(]^2:) > >> ((2^~[)+(2**)+(2^~])) > >> (^&2...@[+(2**)+^&2...@]) > >> (*:@[+(2**)+*:@]) > > > > Note that these are not equivalent (the first > > one gives a different result than the later > > examples). > > Are you sure you haven't just forgotten a pair of > parenthesis? > > 3 7 (2^~[)+(2**)+(2^~]) 9 6 > 9 49 > 3 7 (([^2:)+(2**)+(]^2:)) 9 6 > 144 169 > 3 7 ((2^~[)+(2**)+(2^~])) 9 6 > 144 169 > 3 7 (^&2...@[+(2**)+^&2...@]) 9 6 > 144 169 > 3 7 (*:@[+(2**)+*:@]) 9 6 > 144 169 > > Ambrus Don't forget the simpler version: 3 7 (*:@+) 9 6 144 169 Bo Trænger du til at se det store billede? Kelkoo giver dig gode tilbud på LCD TV! Se her http://dk.yahoo.com/r/pat/lcd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
