Raul wrote:
> I believe (("_)(`'')) could be replaced by ("_) without ill effect.
Probably -- the `'' is a force of habit. It's a very useful phrase for
adverbial programming.
As for the rest of your post, I suggest you try your various ae* with a
larger variety of inputs. In particular, inputs with
nested expressions using parens.
That's not to say my method couldn't be improved. It could. It was a proof of
concept, if you will. I put together the initial
script in a few minutes.
Regarding your comment:
> I think this is undocumented behavior
Maybe. I think it's ambiguous. I could make a strong argument that it's
documented, but it does take a degree of interpretation.
In any event, I'm confident this behavior is reliable. That is, it won't
change in future versions of J.
-Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm