Roger Hui wrote: > > Define "interesting" and then we can talk about > proving whether something is or is not "interesting", > esp. the statement "an infinite sequence isn't interesting > just because all its terms are interesting". It's hard to fathom > an infinite sequence, all of whose terms are "interesting", > leading to a (unique) limit, but the limit is not "interesting". > To me it's hard to imagine any definition of "interesting" integers that would make limits of converging sequences of rationals "interesting", although, as you say, without some definition of "interesting" it's hard to prove anything. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Unforgettable-times-tp25088597s24193p25126273.html Sent from the J Programming mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
