Thanks for alerting me to that, Ric. I have not been consistent in the
usage of 3 versus 13 throughout the book, let alone each chapter. The
original series of papers of course were published over a span of
time, during which J evolved and the author's knowledge increased, so
consistency was not to be expected.

The 13-form certainly saves space and I ought to consider it wherever
the result does not spill onto the next line. Blocks of code cause
formatting problems and account for a good proportion of my
typesetting time to get the appearance right (i.e. optimise the
splitting of code across pages).

I'm beginning to ask myself: do we want it perfect or do we want it by
Christmas? The significance of Gene's book -- and the nature of that
significance (timeless, not ephemeral), inclines me towards "perfect".
But it ought to come out (eventually) when promised. What do others
think?

Wikians -- feel free to update the articles (see
http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/At%20Play%20With%20J). But if you do,
please poke me with the URL or PlayNNN ID so I don't miss your
changes.

Ian


On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Sherlock, Ric
<[email protected]> wrote:
> To maintain consistency with the other verb definitions in the article, I'd 
> suggest using 13 : '' rather than 3 : 0 to define David's BLT
>
> i.e.
>
> BLT=: 13 : '~. bl"1 (y#y)#: i.y^y'
>
>> From: Ian Clark
>>
>> Thank you, David, for your reconstruction of verb BLT. It works fine
>> and gives the expected results. I have inserted it in
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Doc/Articles/Play171 after the first
>> mention of BLT.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:11 AM, David Mitchell wrote:
>> >
>> > In the keeping of brute force:
>> >
>> > bl =: ] i.~ [: /:~ ~.
>> >
>> > BLT=: 3 : 0
>> > ~. bl"1 (y#y)#: i.y^y
>> > )
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to