Oleg, Yes. Thanks for your clear and convincing explanation of both the limit of my original scope and the of the solution you recommend. I haven't digested it all, but am very much on track with your ideas.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Oleg Kobchenko <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] > > Using phrases/phrc7.ijs, > > rfd=: %&180p_1 > vec2=: +...@r.@rfd > cw=: (0 >: *)@cross1&vec2"0 > > ~. (cw/ ; cw/&(135&+) ; cw/&(13&+) ; cw/&dfd)~45*i. 17 [snip] > > -:"0/~ (cw/ ; cw/&(135&+) ; cw/&(13&+) ; cw/&dfd)~45*i. 17 (cw/ ; cw/&(135&+) ; cw/&(13&+) ; cw/&dfd)~45*i. 17 [snip] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
